Give China a few years, and they will develop an export control more robust, and effective than USA. If there is one thing, I have learned reading about China, they actually tend to learn from their mistakes. On the contrary, post- 2016 Washington's policy has been one of flip-flop, and now it has been reduced to the whims of God-Emperor Trump.
No no, you got it wrong. China wants to prevent RE from being used by US military to attack China. That is sufficient explanation. Apply Occam’s razor. All other motives you imply into China is just projection. 😀
Chinese export controls are here to stay. Trump will accept this and say that Xi personally promised him no delays in rare earths! Sigh, I wish Jon Huntsman was President.
The 80’s is when China’s globalist movement started and today, the western world is in decline, decay, and ruined because of the globalist-dictatorship movement.
China is a close market. China can export to the workd but the world cannot export to China. Any products in the world can be made in China then exported back to the world.
On the other hand, TARIFF is an export duty, its a tax on products to be sold in the country. Any country wishes not to pay the TARIFFS, can move to the country to produce therefore no more TARIFF to pay.
China is against TARIFF. China wants total control of exports to the world and tariffs is a hindrance. Therefore, all globalist are against TARIFF. Canadian Liberals are China-UK-India globalist puppets and are against TRUMP and TARIFFS.
This was a great overview of China’s progression. I do think, however, that your interpretation of America’s export control enforcement regime is overly generous. Recent research has found that the BIS is severely underfunded and has serious IT and data management problems that undermine its effectiveness. And it’s not just Nvidia chips slipping through the cracks. Available evidence indicates widespread evasion across various categories of controlled goods (particularly to Russia). Comparing both countries’ enforcement capabilities is fascinating and raises all sorts of questions about how different regime types might perform. But it may be a question of not who can do it well but rather who can fail the least.
Give China a few years, and they will develop an export control more robust, and effective than USA. If there is one thing, I have learned reading about China, they actually tend to learn from their mistakes. On the contrary, post- 2016 Washington's policy has been one of flip-flop, and now it has been reduced to the whims of God-Emperor Trump.
No no, you got it wrong. China wants to prevent RE from being used by US military to attack China. That is sufficient explanation. Apply Occam’s razor. All other motives you imply into China is just projection. 😀
🎯
Great work, Kyle. Keep it up!
Chinese export controls are here to stay. Trump will accept this and say that Xi personally promised him no delays in rare earths! Sigh, I wish Jon Huntsman was President.
Great piece but for the record, the 2010 rare earth export cuts were NOT due to the Japan fishing boats incident! altho they were perceived that way.
The 80’s is when China’s globalist movement started and today, the western world is in decline, decay, and ruined because of the globalist-dictatorship movement.
China is a close market. China can export to the workd but the world cannot export to China. Any products in the world can be made in China then exported back to the world.
On the other hand, TARIFF is an export duty, its a tax on products to be sold in the country. Any country wishes not to pay the TARIFFS, can move to the country to produce therefore no more TARIFF to pay.
China is against TARIFF. China wants total control of exports to the world and tariffs is a hindrance. Therefore, all globalist are against TARIFF. Canadian Liberals are China-UK-India globalist puppets and are against TRUMP and TARIFFS.
This was a great overview of China’s progression. I do think, however, that your interpretation of America’s export control enforcement regime is overly generous. Recent research has found that the BIS is severely underfunded and has serious IT and data management problems that undermine its effectiveness. And it’s not just Nvidia chips slipping through the cracks. Available evidence indicates widespread evasion across various categories of controlled goods (particularly to Russia). Comparing both countries’ enforcement capabilities is fascinating and raises all sorts of questions about how different regime types might perform. But it may be a question of not who can do it well but rather who can fail the least.